Files
OSGKeyboard/ModelTraining/ClipboardSemantics/Consensus/labeling-instructions-v5.md
T
Rocky aa37067f79 chore(semantics): add v6 release gate pipeline
- Add reproducible v6 boundary, blessing, and consensus-adjudication
  corpora, plus the tiny-transformer trainer and v6 release-gate
  evaluator that gate every candidate on the deployed baselines.
- Wire consensus-label merging, product-policy anchor evaluation, and
  sealed blessing benchmark review with their pytest coverage.
- Refresh open-training corpus generation, iterative retraining runner,
  and random-holdout evaluation so v6 candidates can be benchmarked
  end-to-end.
2026-08-29 11:51:42 +08:00

40 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown

# Clipboard semantic consensus labeling v5
Prompt version: `clipboard-consensus-v5`
Apply every rule in `labeling-instructions-v4.md`, with the following
product-owner clarifications taking precedence.
## Replyable message clarifications
- “take your time” is an interpersonal supportive message:
`replyableMessage=true`, `task=false`.
- “知道了,谢谢” is terminal and not replyable.
- “活动规则按当前方案通过” is a passive decision notice and not replyable.
- Sharing a personal outcome such as “事情总算处理完了,结果居然成了” is
replyable even without a direct question.
- A private first-person need such as “I need to set up a new PIN” is a task
but not replyable unless it is addressed to another person.
## Task clarifications
- A first-person decision followed by an impersonal consequence is not
automatically an assignment. “我拍板先发布基础版,其他候选停止评估” is
replyable but not a task because it does not directly assign the recipient.
- A decision that explicitly hands off a next action is a task. “我批准退款流程
的最终版本,可以签字” is replyable and a task.
- Named-recipient communication with actual content is a replyable task:
“text Sarah that I'll be late” and “send an email to Julie that I can meet
Saturday” are both `replyableMessage=true`, `task=true`.
## Scope and ambiguity clarifications
- “tell me what's new” and “my claim status” are generic assistant/system
queries and must be excluded.
- A bare fragment such as “call Mark” does not reveal whether it is an
interpersonal assignment or an assistant command. Keep it unresolved:
`ambiguous=true`, with `replyableMessage`, `task`, and `question` all
`unknown`.
- Apply the same unknown treatment to other low-information fragments rather
than converting unspecified fields to `false`.