aa37067f79
- Add reproducible v6 boundary, blessing, and consensus-adjudication corpora, plus the tiny-transformer trainer and v6 release-gate evaluator that gate every candidate on the deployed baselines. - Wire consensus-label merging, product-policy anchor evaluation, and sealed blessing benchmark review with their pytest coverage. - Refresh open-training corpus generation, iterative retraining runner, and random-holdout evaluation so v6 candidates can be benchmarked end-to-end.
24 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
24 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
# Clipboard semantic evidence adjudication v3
|
|
|
|
Review only the fields listed in `unresolvedFields`. Judge from the text itself;
|
|
do not inspect previous model votes, source labels, or another adjudicator.
|
|
Apply `labeling-instructions-v4.md`.
|
|
|
|
Return one JSON object per input record using the exact schema defined in
|
|
`adjudication-instructions-v2.md`.
|
|
|
|
For compatibility, `recordDisposition` remains `keep` or
|
|
`exclude-device-command`. In v3, `exclude-device-command` also covers generic
|
|
search, system/account queries, and other clearly virtual-assistant-only text.
|
|
It does not cover real-world service requests, named-recipient communication
|
|
with content, or private/shared-context interpersonal questions.
|
|
|
|
Requirements:
|
|
|
|
- Evidence must be a short exact quote copied from the input text.
|
|
- `resolutions`, `confidence`, and `evidence` must contain exactly the fields in
|
|
`unresolvedFields`.
|
|
- Use `unknown` rather than inventing context for low-information fragments.
|
|
- Confidence is per field and must be between 0 and 1.
|
|
- Do not output explanations, markdown, or additional fields.
|